Coatbridge Renewable Energy Facility: Difference between revisions

Bin52 (talk | contribs)
m add new link
Arctellion (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Coatbridge.png|400px|left|Elevation of Coatbridge MRF and EfW Facility from their website]]
{{#vardefine:epr|Tbc#05}}[[Category:EfW Plants]]
[[Category:EfW Plants]]
An [[EfW]] facility based upon [[Gasification]] technology. Shore Energy envisaged an [[RDF]] production facility adjacent to the [[EfW]] facility on the site.
{{EfWTemplate|EPR=Tbc#05|id=60}}
{{EfWTemplate|EPR=|id=60}}[[File:Coatbridge.png|400px|left|Elevation of Coatbridge MRF and EfW Facility from their website]]__TOC__<br clear='left' />
 
==Summary==
==Summary==
An [[EfW]] facility based upon [[Gasification]] technology. Shore Energy envisaged an [[RDF]] production facility adjacent to the [[EfW]] facility on the site.  
An [[EfW]] facility based upon [[Gasification]] technology. Shore Energy envisaged an [[RDF]] production facility adjacent to the [[EfW]] facility on the site.  
Line 11: Line 10:
==Construction==
==Construction==
The planning application for the new larger approach was refused on appeal in November 2020 and it appears that the project will now not progress<ref>[https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/meat-kings-coatbridge-waste-plans-22974853 Daily Record Article]</ref>, although the original planning consent is understood to be extant<ref>[https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/correspondence/2020/10/planning-decision-energy-from-waste-processing-building-at-former-shanks-and-mcewan-site-251-glasgow-and-edinburgh-road-coatbridge/documents/ppa-320-2125-decision-letter-refusing-planning-permission/ppa-320-2125-decision-letter-refusing-planning-permission/govscot%3Adocument/PPA-320-2125%2B-%2BCarnbroe%2Bdecision%2Bletter%2B-%2B3%2BNovember%2B2020_Redacted.pdf Scottish Government Decision Notice]</ref>.
The planning application for the new larger approach was refused on appeal in November 2020 and it appears that the project will now not progress<ref>[https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/meat-kings-coatbridge-waste-plans-22974853 Daily Record Article]</ref>, although the original planning consent is understood to be extant<ref>[https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/correspondence/2020/10/planning-decision-energy-from-waste-processing-building-at-former-shanks-and-mcewan-site-251-glasgow-and-edinburgh-road-coatbridge/documents/ppa-320-2125-decision-letter-refusing-planning-permission/ppa-320-2125-decision-letter-refusing-planning-permission/govscot%3Adocument/PPA-320-2125%2B-%2BCarnbroe%2Bdecision%2Bletter%2B-%2B3%2BNovember%2B2020_Redacted.pdf Scottish Government Decision Notice]</ref>.
==Waste Input==
==Waste Input==
The overall facility was designed to run on 160,000 tonnes per annum, with the new application designed for 204,000 tonnes per annum (on a dry basis). The [[EfW]] facility designed to run on [[RDF]] and [[SRF]] delivered as prepared fuel, or prepared in an adjacent fuel processing facility.  
The overall facility was designed to run on 160,000 tonnes per annum, with the new application designed for 204,000 tonnes per annum (on a dry basis). The [[EfW]] facility designed to run on [[RDF]] and [[SRF]] delivered as prepared fuel, or prepared in an adjacent fuel processing facility.  


==References==
==References==