Lancing EfW: Difference between revisions

From Wikiwaste
Bin52 (talk | contribs)
m minor text changes
Bin52 (talk | contribs)
m Update links
Line 4: Line 4:


==Summary==
==Summary==
An [[EfW]] facility based upon conventional combustion technology which is not considered an [[ERF]] as a result of not having [[R1]] status. Lancing has permitted operational capacity of 75,000 tonnes per annum, and is owned and operated by [[Enviropower Ltd]], a subsidiary of [[Rabbit Group]]. Delivery of waste is from the adjacent [[Rabbit]] transfer station which prepares the [[Waste Derived Fuel]] for the plant comprising a [[Wood Waste]] /[[Biomass]] rich [[RDF]].  
An [[EfW]] facility based upon conventional combustion technology which is not considered an [[ERF]] as a result of not having [[R1]] status. Lancing has permitted operational capacity of 75,000 tonnes per annum, and is owned and operated by [[Enviropower Ltd]], a subsidiary of [[Rabbit Group]]. Delivery of waste is from the adjacent [[Rabbit]] transfer station which prepares the [[Waste Derived Fuel]] for the plant comprising a [[Wood Waste]] /[[Biomass]] rich [[RDF]] and as a result is listed both within the [[Residual Waste EFW]] and [[Biomass Waste EFW]] listings.


==History==
==History==

Revision as of 08:56, 21 April 2020

Rabbit's Lancing Transfer and EFW in background (from Google Street View May 2017)
Rabbit's Lancing Transfer and EFW in background (from Google Street View May 2017)


Lancing EfW
Operational
Site Location
Site Location

See Residual EfW → page for a larger UK Wide map.

Waste Licence XP3030XX
Operator Enviropower Ltd
Region South East
Operational Capacity 75ktpa
Is site R1? fal
When was R1 Granted?
What was the R1 value 0.00
Electrical Capacity 5.00MWe
Number of Lines 2
Number of Turbines 2
CHP
Technology Approach EfW
Funding Type Merchant

Operators Annual Report


Input Data

Year HH C&I Clin RDF Total
2016 0.00 0.00 0.00 59005.00 59005.00
2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 33280.00 33280.00
2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 57012.00 59629.00
2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 51537.00 55021.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 60315.00 64056.00
2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 64666.00 66880.00
2022 0.00 0.00 0.00 52905.00 52905.00
2023 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64158.00


Output Data

Year IBA IBA %ge of Tot IN APC APC %ge of Tot IN
2016 6370.00 10.80% 3580.00 6.07%
2017 4601.00 13.83% 1965.00 5.90%
2018 12365.00 20.74% 3442.00 5.77%
2019 12941.00 23.52% 4300.00 7.82%
2020 11713.00 18.29% 4551.00 7.10%
2021 12262.00 18.33% 3952.00 5.91%
2022 4531.00 8.56% 1823.00 3.45%
2023 6248.00 9.74% 2607.00 4.06%

Summary

An EfW facility based upon conventional combustion technology which is not considered an ERF as a result of not having R1 status. Lancing has permitted operational capacity of 75,000 tonnes per annum, and is owned and operated by Enviropower Ltd, a subsidiary of Rabbit Group. Delivery of waste is from the adjacent Rabbit transfer station which prepares the Waste Derived Fuel for the plant comprising a Wood Waste /Biomass rich RDF and as a result is listed both within the Residual Waste EFW and Biomass Waste EFW listings.

History

The Rabbit facility was opened in 2008 to primarily service residual Wood Waste from skips and construction sources, with later expansion into a wider specification RDF produced in the adjacent transfer station and is reported as costing £15m[1].

Plant

The plant comprises standard combustion, on 2 lines of Talbot Grates, generating super-heated steam, generating up to 5MWe for export to he national grid.

Local Authority Users

The following data comes from WasteDataFlow for the financial year 2018/19 and represents those local authorities recorded as putting tonnage into the site (either directly or via a transfer station). The tonnage received cannot be directly compared with the stated historical tonnage received and recorded in the EA statistics as these are recorded on a calendar year basis (i.e. January 2018 to December 2018). A 'zero return' below indicates no local authority tonnage was recorded, most likely a result of the plant being recently commissioned and actually having received no tonnage. Equally, lower than expected tonnage maybe a result of either a new plant being in 'ramp up' towards full capacity after construction, or may be a result of plant shut down and subsequent re-start in a year.


Authority Tonnage

References