Milton Keynes Waste Recovery Park

From Wikiwaste

An integrated EfW facility with other treatment technologies, with the EfW based upon Gasification technology and not yet considered an ERF based on not having R1 status. The EfW element of the facility at Milton Keynes has permitted operational capacity of 90,000 tonnes per annum, operated by AmeyCespa and owned by Milton Keynes Council.


Milton Keynes Waste Recovery Park
Operational
Site Location
Site Location

See Residual EfW → page for a larger UK Wide map.

Waste Licence HP3323PW
Operator Thalia Waste Management
Region South East
Operational Capacity 140ktpa
Is site R1? fal
When was R1 Granted?
What was the R1 value 0.00
Electrical Capacity 7.00MWe
Number of Lines 2
Number of Turbines 1
CHP No
Technology Approach ACT
Funding Type PPP

Operators Annual Report


Input Data

Year HH C&I Clin RDF Total
2023 105827.00 0.00 0.00 819.00 112012.00


Output Data

Year IBA IBA %ge of Tot IN APC APC %ge of Tot IN
2023 16334.00 14.58% 4127.00 3.68%

Amey Cespa Milton Keynes Waste Recovery Park
Amey Cespa Milton Keynes Waste Recovery Park


Summary

An integrated EfW facility with other treatment technologies, with the EfW based upon Gasification technology and not yet considered an ERF based on not having R1 status. The EfW element of the facility at Milton Keynes has permitted operational capacity of 90,000 tonnes per annum, operated by AmeyCespa and owned by Milton Keynes Council.

History

The Milton Keynes facility was built as an integrated solution primarily to service a 15 year PPP contract with Milton Keynes Council signed in June 2013 to process around 130,000 tonnes per annum via the different technologies on site . The facility diverts around 140,000 tonnes per annum from Landfill via a combination of Mechanical Biological Treatment including Anaerobic Digestion, with the RDF output sent to the ATT/Gasification facility with a capacity listed of 90,000 tonnes per annum and power output of 6MWe [1].

Plant

A Design, Build, Operate contract with AmeyCespa (with Volker Fitzpatrick as Amey's civil engineering partner) which started in Spring 2014 and which was commissioned in summer 2018. The Gasification technology was delivered by Energos, and AmeyCespa had to step in when the technology company went into liquidation in 2016 (which also impacted upon the Glasgow and Sinfin Lane facilities).

Local Authority Data

The table below lists those local authorities who have recorded their tonnage on WasteDataFlow as sending their Waste to this site (either directly or via a transfer station) for the most recent financial year, data was updated on Error: no local variable "updated" has been set.. The tonnage received cannot be directly compared with the stated historical tonnage received and recorded in the EA statistics as these are recorded on a calendar year basis (i.e. January 2018 to December 2018). The total Local Authority waste received by the plant in the period was: 0t

A 'zero return' or a below expected return, when compared to the EA Data below indicates that either:

  • no local authority tonnage was recorded/no tonnage was sent to the site in the period (but has been listed as it may have previously received tonnage from a local authority) or
  • a result of the plant being recently commissioned and actually having received no tonnage or
  • a lower than expected tonnage maybe a result of a local authority splitting their tonnage over multiple sites, having less tonnage to send than might be anticipated or
  • it may be a new plant being in 'ramp up' towards full capacity after construction or
  • may be a result of plant shut down and subsequent re-start in a year or
  • the local authority may not have correctly entered the site's details on WasteDataFlow


Authority Tonnage

Waste Tonnage, By Origin

The table shows a list of the Waste for the Permit HP3323PW, that has arrived into sites as reported to the Regulator and then publicised in their reported statistics. The Data used is from the most recent returns. The total reported tonnage arriving at the site was: Expression error: Unexpected < operator.t.

Where this tonnage exceeds that reported in year of the corresponding annual report, this may be due to the following reasons:

  • Tonnage may have been received but not incinerated, i.e. the material is held pending incineration (the operator return to the EA reports as received whereas the annual report focuses on when the waste is incinerated.)
  • Material may have been received into the site but treated in some other way than incineration.
  • Material may have been received on the but transferred out of site for disposal/treatment at another site rather than incineration on the site.
EWC Code Origin of Waste Tonnes In


References