InHouse: Difference between revisions

From Wikiwaste
Added reference line and minor layout changes
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


Increasingly the InHouse alternative being considered is the [[LATCs]] or [[TECKAL]] arrangement which is to some degree an [[OutSourced]] option but by an InHouse style arms-length company
Increasingly the InHouse alternative being considered is the [[LATCs]] or [[TECKAL]] arrangement which is to some degree an [[OutSourced]] option but by an InHouse style arms-length company
By selecting the 'What links here' in the index to the left of this page, the [[Waste Collection Authority]] that utilizes the arrangement is listed for reference.
==References==
==References==
<references />
<references />
==Who Uses This Method==
{{Special:WhatLinksHere/InHouse|limit=500}}

Revision as of 11:18, 20 November 2019

In the broadest sense InHouse can be defined by 'work or activities done by employees of an organisation or company, rather than workers outside the organization or company'[1].

In the context of a Waste Collection Authority it is an expression of whether the services required are delivered by the Waste Collection Authority itself or by a third party private company that has successfully been awarded the work under competitive tendering as an OutSourced arrangement. The arrangements can bundle with other services (i.e. beach cleaning) or keep different collection aspects separate (i.e the collection of Dry Recyclables may be separate from the collection of Residual Waste).

Legally the Waste Collection Authority is required to periodically demonstrate that by delivering the service themselves that it is economically more advantageous than OutSourced arrangements

Increasingly the InHouse alternative being considered is the LATCs or TECKAL arrangement which is to some degree an OutSourced option but by an InHouse style arms-length company

References

  1. Collins 2019

Who Uses This Method